<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SEO Consultant Services : Improve Search Engine Ranking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk</link>
	<description>The #1 UK source for Search Engine Optimisation Advice and SEO Consultant Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Static HTML vs Dynamic URLs by SEO Expert</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/static-html-vs-dynamic-urls.html/comment-page-1#comment-44150</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/static-html-vs-dynamic-urls.html#comment-44150</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s dynamic URLs for the comments now on this site and they will be indexed by Google.

The comment above of mine has a link at the bottom to

http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/static-html-vs-dynamic-urls.html?cid=44145

I&#039;m using a WordPress plugin called SEO Super Comments with my own code changes and it uses larger comments to create pages like the one above.

Give it a week and you&#039;ll find that page will be indexed in Google, try a site search to see-

site:http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/ cid

Just activated the SEO Super Comments plugin on this site, but been running it a while at other sites, try this search in Google:

site:http://www.google-adsense-templates.co.uk/ cid

You can see over 70 of that sites comments have an individual page indexed in Google.

Search Google for &quot;Individual AdSense channel IDs&quot; and one of the comments is number one. Another comment page is top 10 for &quot;AdSense Style Clickbank Ads&quot;, so Google ranks them.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s dynamic URLs for the comments now on this site and they will be indexed by Google.</p>
<p>The comment above of mine has a link at the bottom to</p>
<p>http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/static-html-vs-dynamic-urls.html?cid=44145</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using a WordPress plugin called SEO Super Comments with my own code changes and it uses larger comments to create pages like the one above.</p>
<p>Give it a week and you&#8217;ll find that page will be indexed in Google, try a site search to see-</p>
<p>site:http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/ cid</p>
<p>Just activated the SEO Super Comments plugin on this site, but been running it a while at other sites, try this search in Google:</p>
<p>site:http://www.google-adsense-templates.co.uk/ cid</p>
<p>You can see over 70 of that sites comments have an individual page indexed in Google.</p>
<p>Search Google for &#8220;Individual AdSense channel IDs&#8221; and one of the comments is number one. Another comment page is top 10 for &#8220;AdSense Style Clickbank Ads&#8221;, so Google ranks them.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Static HTML vs Dynamic URLs by SEO Expert</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/static-html-vs-dynamic-urls.html/comment-page-1#comment-44145</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/static-html-vs-dynamic-urls.html#comment-44145</guid>
		<description>Google sees a static HTML page when you use software like WordPress that by default uses dynamic URLs, but can be setup to show static like URLs.

So yes Google sees a page like /post_name.html as static even if the &#039;real&#039; URL is /?=page1.

You&#039;ve misinterpreted my explanation regarding WordPress.

Although WordPress is created using a set of theme files (could in theory be from one theme file) that are combined together with a database to form as many pages/posts you&#039;ve created: so a WordPress site with 20,000 posts has the same number of files on the server as one with 2 posts, the posts/pages do not physically exist on the server.

Even if you didn&#039;t use the SEO permalinks option in WordPress, Google will still index each page/post as an independent page, because each one has a unique (dynamic) URL and unique content (if the content isn&#039;t unique you&#039;ll have issues).

Basically it doesn&#039;t make any difference. Google doesn&#039;t care if you have an actual static page, a static like URL (created dynamically, but using mod_rewrite so looks static: note Google etc... can&#039;t tell the difference between an actual static page and a mod_rewrite static like page) or a dynamic URL, Google can still find and index it as a unique page and all three types can rank high as well.

The only important factors with dynamic vs static is spidering speed (static and static like are spidered faster) and static/static like can be better SEO&#039;d:

basically

keyword-rich-page.html

Is better SEO wise than the dynamic equivalents like

index.php?page=1

or

index.php?page=keyword+rich+page

But all three would be spidered and ranked by Google as unique pages as long as they have mostly unique content.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google sees a static HTML page when you use software like WordPress that by default uses dynamic URLs, but can be setup to show static like URLs.</p>
<p>So yes Google sees a page like /post_name.html as static even if the &#8216;real&#8217; URL is /?=page1.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve misinterpreted my explanation regarding WordPress.</p>
<p>Although WordPress is created using a set of theme files (could in theory be from one theme file) that are combined together with a database to form as many pages/posts you&#8217;ve created: so a WordPress site with 20,000 posts has the same number of files on the server as one with 2 posts, the posts/pages do not physically exist on the server.</p>
<p>Even if you didn&#8217;t use the SEO permalinks option in WordPress, Google will still index each page/post as an independent page, because each one has a unique (dynamic) URL and unique content (if the content isn&#8217;t unique you&#8217;ll have issues).</p>
<p>Basically it doesn&#8217;t make any difference. Google doesn&#8217;t care if you have an actual static page, a static like URL (created dynamically, but using mod_rewrite so looks static: note Google etc&#8230; can&#8217;t tell the difference between an actual static page and a mod_rewrite static like page) or a dynamic URL, Google can still find and index it as a unique page and all three types can rank high as well.</p>
<p>The only important factors with dynamic vs static is spidering speed (static and static like are spidered faster) and static/static like can be better SEO&#8217;d:</p>
<p>basically</p>
<p>keyword-rich-page.html</p>
<p>Is better SEO wise than the dynamic equivalents like</p>
<p>index.php?page=1</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>index.php?page=keyword+rich+page</p>
<p>But all three would be spidered and ranked by Google as unique pages as long as they have mostly unique content.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Static HTML vs Dynamic URLs by Lars Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/static-html-vs-dynamic-urls.html/comment-page-1#comment-44089</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/static-html-vs-dynamic-urls.html#comment-44089</guid>
		<description>I loved Carrick&#039;s question. Could anyone knowledgeable reply? Carrick, what did you learn regarding your question?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Carrick&#8217;s question. Could anyone knowledgeable reply? Carrick, what did you learn regarding your question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 301 Redirects and www/non-www Canonical Problems by Claire</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/301-redirects-www-non-www-canonical-problems.html/comment-page-1#comment-38747</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/301-redirects-www-non-www-canonical-problems.html#comment-38747</guid>
		<description>I know this post is ages old but just wanted to say thanks, this file saved me a total headache.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this post is ages old but just wanted to say thanks, this file saved me a total headache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 301 Redirects and www/non-www Canonical Problems by sushilver</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/301-redirects-www-non-www-canonical-problems.html/comment-page-1#comment-36116</link>
		<dc:creator>sushilver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/301-redirects-www-non-www-canonical-problems.html#comment-36116</guid>
		<description>Hey,

Everything is fine but what about window hosting problem? how we can resolve url canonical issue with window hosting.

Regards
sushilver</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>Everything is fine but what about window hosting problem? how we can resolve url canonical issue with window hosting.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
sushilver</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 301 Redirects and www/non-www Canonical Problems by Kesa</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/301-redirects-www-non-www-canonical-problems.html/comment-page-1#comment-34247</link>
		<dc:creator>Kesa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/301-redirects-www-non-www-canonical-problems.html#comment-34247</guid>
		<description>Wow! Thank you a ton.. explanation was perfect and easy to comprehend. Much appreciated. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Thank you a ton.. explanation was perfect and easy to comprehend. Much appreciated. <img src='http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bing Search Engine and Awstats Log Stats Analyzer by live search engine</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/bing-search-engine-and-awstats-log-stats-analyzer.html/comment-page-1#comment-34203</link>
		<dc:creator>live search engine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/?p=41#comment-34203</guid>
		<description>I experienced that Google searches are more effective than searches in Bing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I experienced that Google searches are more effective than searches in Bing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Static HTML vs Dynamic URLs by shenba</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/static-html-vs-dynamic-urls.html/comment-page-1#comment-33863</link>
		<dc:creator>shenba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/static-html-vs-dynamic-urls.html#comment-33863</guid>
		<description>i ve better understood abt t diff b/w static and dynamic webpages</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i ve better understood abt t diff b/w static and dynamic webpages</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bing Search Engine and Awstats Log Stats Analyzer by Heather May</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/bing-search-engine-and-awstats-log-stats-analyzer.html/comment-page-1#comment-33810</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 08:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/?p=41#comment-33810</guid>
		<description>my default search engine is Yahoo but now i am       using BING because it is much better than Yahoo. i heard that Bing search engine would power Yahoo search also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my default search engine is Yahoo but now i am       using BING because it is much better than Yahoo. i heard that Bing search engine would power Yahoo search also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WordPress SEO CMS by Wordpress SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/wordpress-seo-cms.html/comment-page-1#comment-33766</link>
		<dc:creator>Wordpress SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 02:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-consultant-services.co.uk/?p=29#comment-33766</guid>
		<description>Great simple explanation for WordPress! Very well put with some great points about WP! I love it myself and use it on every website I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great simple explanation for WordPress! Very well put with some great points about WP! I love it myself and use it on every website I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
